This is how the mechanism for the ornament that adorns the column will look. As seen, once the room (and therefore the column) gets pushed up and down, the ornaments on it appears differently. Hence CONTAINER --> ORNAMENT
Is it? I thought its 'how the form of the container might shape the ornament and create a new identity for the ornament'? For example, when we were discussing with Nill, its how the body informs the shape/appearance of the earring, like different person wearing the same earring would produce different appearance of the earrings? Well origitally it was how we interact with the ornament and how space changes accordingly, but now from my understanding its how the container/ the space might change the ornament?
i thought u want the reverse:
ReplyDeleteornament --> container ?
Is it? I thought its 'how the form of the container might shape the ornament and create a new identity for the ornament'? For example, when we were discussing with Nill, its how the body informs the shape/appearance of the earring, like different person wearing the same earring would produce different appearance of the earrings? Well origitally it was how we interact with the ornament and how space changes accordingly, but now from my understanding its how the container/ the space might change the ornament?
ReplyDeleteyes and from that it affects back into the ornament and create this loop of interaction between container & ornament
ReplyDeleteoo okay krub. So its really both ornament--> container and container --> ornament?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.mediafire.com/?439hvxwo56a69
or simply
ReplyDeletecontainer <--> ornament
for now
to expand further, do more reading from Alois Riegl, Debra Schafter, and James Ward among others
and why is the file so big? can you make it less than 1mb?
ReplyDelete